Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponcomment this pageEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on LinkedInDigg thisShare on Tumblrfark this page

Australian comedian Jim Jefferies isn’t afraid to rattle a few cages because, you know, that’s what comedians like to do. In this video he gives his thoughts on the touchy issue of gun control in America.

Speaking about subjects like the Sandy Hook massacre he makes his opinions on guns pretty clear— namely, he doesn’t think gun ownership is a great idea. The clip is taken from his new standup show called Jim Jefferies – Bare, recently released on Netflix.

If you’ve got strong feelings on the 2nd Amendment either way (and who hasn’t?), then you need to watch this. And for all the gun owners that this segment will no doubt offend, Jefferies recently posted the following to his Facebook page.

And just to clarify, by “nut jobs” he probably means people like this guy:


Watch part two of the gun control stand up routine below.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponcomment this pageEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on LinkedInDigg thisShare on Tumblrfark this page

When it comes to grandmas who rock, the 68 year-old lead singer of Grindmother is up there. It was back in 2015 that Canadian Rain Forest’s group…


For any keen biker i’m sure you’ve all seen plenty of ‘How To Ride A Motorcycle’ videos as you get tips and prepare to take your two…


Creative librarians, do they actually exist, is that phrase a paradox or maybe ‘Creative librarians’ is actually an oxymoron. Who knows? How about Books, can you remember…


The grim and stark realities of the today’s world are brought to vivid and grotesque life by British animator and artist Steve Cutts. From the Banksy school…


Whoah. The subject of incest is never something you can laugh at. Is it? Things take a turn for the disturbing in this funny short film by…


‘Mate vs Mate’ prank wars makes you feel very grateful you don’t count internet prankster Shammi as a best friend, because if you did you could very…


If you have a pet, you are probably aware that there are times where they look at you in a certain way and it makes you wonder…


So who needs a 4.2 billion pound super sewer then? Well, apparently London, the capital of England does funnily enough. Have you heard about it? The super…


Adam Buxton, in case you don’t know him, is a British comedian who was one half of comedy duo Adam and Joe with Joe Cornish. They had…


It’s possible that the you sitting there is but one you in a multiverse of yous. Which means that there are many earths and many alternate realities….


Derpy animals are everywhere, if you look hard enough, especially on Google image search. Perhaps you even have one as a pet. Derpy, if you needed reminding,…


A billboard in Toronto is causing drivers to question the ethics of Wathan Funeral Home who proclaim in huge letters “Text and Drive.” The idea is that…

  • Brian

    FUCK THIS aussie CUNT.!!!

    • saultite

      while it may be comedy it is quite on the mark!!!

  • lookatthisdamncomment

    one day, in the future, the government might get to a point where they need people to do something the government says is in their best interest, but the people think it’s not. On that day, the people will say ‘NO’, but since the government will be the only one with guns, the government will simply say ‘oh really?’, and that will be that. You WILL do what the government says, or you will be killed, end of story. What people like this guy believes, is that it is impossible for that day to come. That is where he is wrong. 100% wrong. This is why the Right to Bear Arms is so important: not to be a douche with a gun, but to one day have the option of saying ‘NO’ to the government that is clearly oppressive and wrong. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    • I am Groot

      And like the guy said, have fun taking potshots at a tank with your hunting rifle. If the government went complete dictator we wouldn’t have much of a chance because they would have much better weapons.

      • lookatthisdamncomment

        assuming ‘tank crews’ will blatantly follow idiots in washingtons’ orders…

      • Loui Siana

        The misconception is that the Military numbers are great. The Army makes up about 1% of the U.S. population. A few tanks vs thousands don’t stand a chance.

      • Bladerunner64

        You’re right I am Groot, but you have to consider that any and all military weapons, vehicles, airplanes, ships, etc… require fuel, and spare parts, oh, let’s not forget ammo. If these weapon systems are not maintained, they eventually quit functioning. If fuel isn’t delivered, they quit running. I can go on and on but I figure you get the idea. You’re also assuming that military personnel will follow orders blindly, maybe some will but I doubt all of them will, in which case, we would have us a civil war. There are plenty of veterans out here that know the weapon systems and their weak points, know how to make explosives, IED’s, booby traps, etc…in other words, don’t write off the little guy just because he doesn’t have a tank at his disposal. Remember the “sticky bombs” from Saving Private Ryan?

  • Devil Dog

    LOL This dude’s hilarious. Points taken but still supporting 2nd amendment. Sure it’s there for a reason.